| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
The HTML versions are mainly useful for generating the online documentation as
part of a CI pipeline. They are installed anyway, which is redundant for
systems with a man page reader, but handy elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also reduces the amount of code duplication in general, since the "measure with
the constructor then allocate and actually construct" pattern (more or less)
only needs to be implemented for a given node type in one place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although functions/components that require minimal pre-existing state are nice,
these allocate memory and could potentially share resources. So, give them a
pointer to a world which can be used to configure such things. In particular,
this is working towards supporting custom allocators everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is mainly for developer or power-user cases, where one wants to look at
some data for investigation or debugging. In such cases, it's common for the
set of prefixes to be implicitly known (because they are baked in to the
application, for example), so printing them just produces a large amount of
redundant noise.
That said, it can also be useful programmatically, because it allows several
snippets to be written independently and ultimately concatenated (with a header
to define the prefixes) without redundancy.
|
|
More or less the same rationale as the previous commit, but for reading. This
makes for nice symmetry with writing, at the cost of a slightly more annoying
reader interface since the source doesn't know its block size or name.
|
|
This makes the paging mechanism an internal detail once again. While it's
conceptually elegant to simply have a single write interface and have the block
dumper just be another implementation of that, unfortunately it is not
practical. The inlining of serd_block_dumper_write() is a significant
performance boost, because it avoids a non-inlinable function call of overhead
per character.
Compared to the SerdByteSink approach, this removes the burden and overhead of
needing to dynamically allocate the structure itself.
|
|
Essentially replaces serd_buffer_sink_finish() with serd_buffer_close(), which
makes writing to a buffer consistent with writing to a file or anything else.
|
|
Since this is not the default (because that would break the default build for
some older systems), distributions and users are likely covering the C99 case
heavily, so this is the best way to ensure that both are covered well.
|
|
This seems like pointless complexity now, since it's easy to just write simply
ordered statements yourself.
|
|
This is a common convention in Turtle and TriG because the special "a" syntax
for rdf type as the first property looks nice, makes things easier to read, and
can be useful for streaming implementations because the type of the instance is
known before reading its properties.
Also significantly clean up the pretty-printing implementation in the process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The earlier "test" was just hitting the code without actually checking the
output. This new suite is a set of pretty-printed documents which serd must
reproduce from a model exactly to pass. This should make it easy to add cases
in the future, since each case is just a document, as it should look.
|
|
|
|
Especially with the new functionality, the complexity of the command-line
interface alone was really becoming unmanageable. The serdi implementation
also had the highest cyclomatic complexity of the entire codebase by a huge
margin.
So, take a page from the Unix philosophy and split serdi into several more
finely-honed tools that can be freely composed. Though there is still
unfortunately quite a bit of option overlap between them due to the common
details of reading RDF, I think the resulting tools are a lot easier to
understand, both from a user and a developer perspective.
|
|
Though potentially useful, I don't think the complexity cost of the old
interface (both to the implementation and to the user) is worth it. A special
tool to transform blank node labels (for example with regular expressions)
would be a better approach to this if it's ever needed in the future.
|
|
Although the "verbatim" idea is nice and simple, more fine-grained control is
necessary since these features (relative URI preservation and blank node label
clash avoidance) are useful in different situations.
|
|
|
|
While occasionally useful, I almost always end up reproducing the issue live to
investigate something anyway. Not keeping the many tests results around
results in less clutter, and hopefully makes the test suites faster in
environments with bad I/O like Docker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This simplifies everything by replacing special cases with a more general close
function. A type is no longer stored in the structure, so the other
constructors are now essentially syntactic sugar for the universal
serd_byte_sink_new_function().
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This separates the command-line tool code from the library implementation.
|
|
This is more powerful, and reduces the number of command line options that
almost nobody needs to care about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
