| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Although functions/components that require minimal pre-existing state are nice,
these allocate memory and could potentially share resources. So, give them a
pointer to a world which can be used to configure such things. In particular,
this is working towards supporting custom allocators everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is mainly for developer or power-user cases, where one wants to look at
some data for investigation or debugging. In such cases, it's common for the
set of prefixes to be implicitly known (because they are baked in to the
application, for example), so printing them just produces a large amount of
redundant noise.
That said, it can also be useful programmatically, because it allows several
snippets to be written independently and ultimately concatenated (with a header
to define the prefixes) without redundancy.
|
|
More or less the same rationale as the previous commit, but for reading. This
makes for nice symmetry with writing, at the cost of a slightly more annoying
reader interface since the source doesn't know its block size or name.
|
|
This makes the paging mechanism an internal detail once again. While it's
conceptually elegant to simply have a single write interface and have the block
dumper just be another implementation of that, unfortunately it is not
practical. The inlining of serd_block_dumper_write() is a significant
performance boost, because it avoids a non-inlinable function call of overhead
per character.
Compared to the SerdByteSink approach, this removes the burden and overhead of
needing to dynamically allocate the structure itself.
|
|
This is a common convention in Turtle and TriG because the special "a" syntax
for rdf type as the first property looks nice, makes things easier to read, and
can be useful for streaming implementations because the type of the instance is
known before reading its properties.
Also significantly clean up the pretty-printing implementation in the process.
|
|
Especially with the new functionality, the complexity of the command-line
interface alone was really becoming unmanageable. The serdi implementation
also had the highest cyclomatic complexity of the entire codebase by a huge
margin.
So, take a page from the Unix philosophy and split serdi into several more
finely-honed tools that can be freely composed. Though there is still
unfortunately quite a bit of option overlap between them due to the common
details of reading RDF, I think the resulting tools are a lot easier to
understand, both from a user and a developer perspective.
|
|
Although the "verbatim" idea is nice and simple, more fine-grained control is
necessary since these features (relative URI preservation and blank node label
clash avoidance) are useful in different situations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This simplifies everything by replacing special cases with a more general close
function. A type is no longer stored in the structure, so the other
constructors are now essentially syntactic sugar for the universal
serd_byte_sink_new_function().
|
|
|
|
This separates the command-line tool code from the library implementation.
|
